Since the discharge of the Apple M1 Max laptops, efficiency figures evaluating it with NVIDIA, AMD, and Intel have proven the brand new chip is just not as very best as the corporate claims it to be. Now, Twitter consumer David Huang in contrast the video codec efficiency of the Apple M1 Max CPU with Intel’s Arc A380 GPUs to indicate that Apple doesn’t proceed to dominate the competitors.

Intel Arc GPU outperforms Apple M1 Max SOC in video decoder efficiency exams

Readers ought to be aware that Apple shines in CPU efficiency. It presents a better high quality, however solely by a slim margin. However, it does take a success in graphical efficiency. An instance is NVIDIA’s newer RTX 30 sequence taking near a 3rd much less time to render than the Apple M1 Max can. The two important components of the Twitter thread between David Huang and consumer @Adol_Christin is under.

M1 Max视频解码单元的性能看起来是不如DG2 (1299元)的。。。极端情况下(超高码率)解码性能只有一半左右,低码率差距则比较小。

另外M1 Max跟DG2一样有两个媒体单元,所以并行解码两个以上的视频流可以达到翻倍的帧数,利于剪视频回放。

其它格式诸如HEVC 422/444或者ProRes之类的就不测了( pic.twitter.com/uD7X738rc1

— David Huang (@hjc4869) July 30, 2022

玩笑放一边,Intel DG2现在驱动和ISV适配仍然有非常大的问题,有up主抱怨达芬奇之类软件导出视频甚至会出现花屏闪屏等等。相比之下Apple的软件支持要好得多。

而且虽然Intel的回放性能可能略强一些,但是还是强的比较有限,对Apple的优势不像跟AMD VCN那么大的差距。

— David Huang (@hjc4869) July 30, 2022

The translation offered by Twitter reveals the efficiency take a look at outcomes from Huang’s benchmark between the Intel Arc A380 GPU and the Apple M1 Max SOC.

The efficiency of the M1 Max video decoding unit appears to be inferior to the DG2 (1299 yuan)… In excessive circumstances (ultra-high bit fee), the decoding efficiency is just about half, and the hole between low bit charges is comparatively small.

In addition, the M1 Max has two media items just like the DG2 (Intel Arc A380), so the parallel decoding of greater than two video streams can double the variety of frames, which is handy for video clipping and playback.

Other codecs reminiscent of HEVC 422/444 or ProRes are excluded (

Apple nonetheless has an enormous benefit, the largest one is…they’re actually promoting the M1 Pro/Max

Joke apart, Intel DG2 nonetheless has very large issues with driver and ISV adaptation. Some up masters complain that DaVinci and different software program export movies and actually have a splash display screen and so forth. Apple’s software program assist is a lot better by comparability.

And though Intel’s playback efficiency could also be barely stronger, it’s nonetheless comparatively restricted, and the benefit to Apple is just not as large as that of AMD VCN.

Test Shows Arc GPU vs M1 Max Video Decoding Performance, Intel Superior To Apple 2

Video Decoder Performance of a number of methods and their efficiency on each the Jellyfish and bilibili video exams. Source: David Huang (@hjc4869 on Twitter)

In the Jellyfish 4K HVEC (30fps, 400Mbps) and bilibili 4K HVEC HDR (120fps, 14Mbps) video stream exams, the bit fee of the Apple M1 Max is at 61 where the Intel Arc A380 GPU bit fee is sitting at 118. The latter video stream presents the same view, with Apple providing a 417-bit fee to Intel’s 542-bit fee.

However, Huang factors out that M1 Max does provide higher software program assist. Still, the argument may additionally stand that Apple is in its atmosphere, where Intel, AMD, and NVIDIA are utilized in a number of configurations outdoors of Apple’s atmosphere.

News Source: David Huang on Twitter