Microsoft’s pending $69 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard is quick approaching, and as such, the merger is beneath evaluation from quite a few competitors regulators world wide. Last week, we heard from numerous main publishers, who had been requested by Brazilian regulators to offer ideas on the Acti-Blizz acquisition. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Sony was the corporate most strongly in opposition to Microsoft shopping for the writer, arguing that Call of Duty was an “essential” franchise in a class all its personal. They additionally argued that including CoD to Xbox Game Pass can be a tipping level that may make Microsoft an unstoppably dominant drive within the subscription service area.

Well, Microsoft has now fired again, and their response to Sony is moderately withering (due to ResetEra consumer Iras for the interpretation of a few of these quotes). Microsoft rightfully factors out that they’ve dedicated to nonetheless releasing Call of Duty on PlayStation platforms, and thus Sony’s actual concern is that they don’t need the Game Pass subscription mannequin disrupting their dominance on the subject of conventional boxed and digital game gross sales.

“Sony’s concern with the potential competition of Game Pass simply reflects the usual resistance of traditional incumbents to competition on merit represented by disruptive players. […] In short, Sony is not resigned to having to compete with Microsoft’s subscription service. Sony’s public outcry on subscription games and the company’s response are clear: Sony doesn’t want attractive subscription services to threaten its dominance in the market for digital distribution of console games. In other words, Sony rails against the introduction of new monetization models capable of challenging its business model.”

Microsoft additionally argues Sony’s complaints are hypocritical, given they interact in their very own competitors stifling practices, together with paying publishers for “blocking rights” to maintain titles off Game Pass.

“Considering that exclusivity strategies have been at the core of Sony’s strategy to strengthen its presence in the games industry, and that Sony is a leader in the distribution of digital games, Sony’s concern with possible exclusivity of Activision‘s content is incoherent, to say the least. Indeed, Microsoft’s ability to continue expanding Game Pass has been obstructed by Sony’s desire to inhibit such growth. Sony pays for ‘blocking rights’ to prevent developers from adding content to Game Pass and other competing subscription services.”

Finally, Microsoft argues that Call of Duty is just not in a particular class that may require it to be handled otherwise than different main gaming franchises. Nor is Activision Blizzard as an organization, which contributed solely two video games to the highest 20 titles launched on PlayStation in 2021.

“Sony is limited to commenting on Call of Duty’s brand strength and loyalty and engagement. However, claiming that Call of Duty has a loyal following is a premise from which the conclusion that the game is a “category of games in itself” does not follow. The PlayStation itself has a foundation established by players loyal to the brand. This finding, however, does not lead to the conclusion that the PlayStation – or any branded product with loyal consumers – is a separate market from all other consoles. Extrapolating from such a finding, the extreme conclusion that Call of Duty is a “game category in itself” is simply unjustifiable under any quantitative or qualitative analysis.”

Honestly, Microsoft makes a reasonably sturdy case. Yes, Call of Duty is massive, however I don’t assume Sony has actually made a robust argument that they couldn’t compete with out it (when was the final time a Nintendo console had a brand new core CoD game?) And once more, Call of Duty will nonetheless be on PlayStation, so it’s fairly clear irritation with Game Pass is Sony’s essential motivating issue.

Activision Blizzard has confronted a collection of lawsuits and different authorized motion on the heels of a go well with filed by California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) alleging widespread gender-based discrimination and sexual harassment on the Call of Duty writer. You can get extra particulars on that unfolding story right here.

What do you people assume? Are Sony’s complaints in regards to the Activision Blizzard acquisition truthful? Or is Microsoft right to shrug them off?

Products talked about on this put up