Government Whistleblowers Might Get Immunity For Coming Forward With UFO Shut Encounters
On: July 9, 2022
Rep. Mike Gallagher has proposed an modification that will give immunity to anybody who comes ahead with info regarding unidentified aerial phenomenon (UAP). The modification is aimed toward rising the variety of stories by offering whistleblower-like protections for these doing so.
Over the years, many have come ahead with tales of extraterrestrial encounters, solely to be met with skepticism and fraud allegations. U.S. troops and authorities contractors have been reluctant to share their tales of UFO sightings for a lot of causes, regardless of how legitimate they might be. Add to that the truth that the federal government has been accused of holding again proof of UAPs and associated applications, and you’ve got a recipe for an surroundings that isn’t very pleasant for anybody to return ahead with potential proof of their very own.
Rep. Mike Gallagher hopes to quell lots of these considerations with an modification he has proposed. It mainly states that no matter any earlier written or oral non-disclosure agreements “that could be interpreted as a legal constraint on reporting by a witness of an unidentified aerial phenomena,” these with details about UAPs wouldn’t be in violation of federal labeled info legal guidelines in the event that they selected to return ahead.
In addition to the above, the modification additionally requires the pinnacle of the brand new Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) to ascertain “a secure system” for receiving stories of “any events relating to” UAPs and any authorities or authorities contractor exercise or program associated to UAPs, sometimes called UFOs. The AOIMSG is tasked with investigating UAPs on behalf of the Defense Secretary and Director of National Intelligence.
Image Credit: Photovision from Pixabay
The modification provides that every one info would first be screened “to prevent unauthorized public reporting or compromise of properly classified military and intelligence systems, programs, and related activity, including all categories and levels of special access and compartmented access programs, current, historical, and future.”
If anybody does come ahead with info and finds themselves being retaliated towards, that individual “may bring a private civil action for all appropriate remedies, including injunctive relief and compensatory and punitive damages, against the Government or other employer who took the personnel action, in the United States Court of Federal Claims,” in response to the modification.
The predominant focus of the modification appears to be aimed toward offering whistleblower-like protections for individuals who work for federal businesses and contractors working with the federal government.
Rep. Tim Burchett informed reporters following a congressional listening to on UAPs, “By telling you that they have whistleblower protection or something, that’s bogus until it’s in the law. For us to sit here and talk about it is bogus. And you really need to provide them with some sort of ability to come in here and not be persecuted and not have a blemish on those records.”
