AMD has launched a brand new on-line GPU comparability device and it much less biased than you may assume. Yes, that completely seems like a backhanded praise, however we do not truly imply it that manner. As any fellow geek can attest, we are usually a jaded bunch with regards to a producer’s personal benchmark information and claims. But in an effort for “full transparency,” AMD’s graphs evaluating Radeon RX 6000 and GeForce RTX 30 collection graphics tilt in each instructions, relying on the game.
There are some nuances that we’ll focus on, however at a excessive stage overview, the comparability device presents 4 pull down menus to assist customers evaluate graphics playing cards from each firms. They embody “Game Title,” “Screen Resolution,” “Setting,” and “API,” every of which is self-explanatory.
When you make your picks, a graph under is up to date in actual time with AMD’s personal benchmark figures, and you’ll toggle between “FPS” and “FPS/$” comparisons.
“All performance numbers have been generated and verified by testing in AMD internal labs,” AMD explains.
There are 11 well-liked video games to check. Several of them are what we’d contemplate to be ‘AMD pleasant’ corresponding to Assassin’s Creed Valhalla, Resident Evil Village, and Forza Horizon 5. So you possibly can argue that there’s truly some bias within the game picks, however they do not all the time favor AMD over NVIDIA within the offered benchmarks.
For instance, Resident Evil Village graph with benchmarks obtained at 3840×2160, Max settings, and DX12 show show the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti beating the Radeon RX 6900 XT. Likewise, it additionally exhibits the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti beating the Radeon RX 6800 XT and the GeForce RTX 3080 edging out the Radeon RX 6800.
There are some oddities, although. In a number of benchmarks, AMD’s information has the GeForce RTX 3090 shedding to the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti. We did not observe that in our testing. It’s value noting that within the positive print, AMD says its information “may contain technical inaccuracies, omissions and typographical errors, and AMD is under no obligation to update or otherwise correct the information.” That mentioned, the numbers for essentially the most half do not see out of whack to us, however positively preserve that in thoughts.
As to these nuances, the roundup of playing cards will not be constant throughout all of the pull-down choices. If you drop all the way down to 1920×1080, it is a smaller number of GPUs within the mid-range and decrease finish segments. To be truthful, players contemplating a Radeon RX 6950 XT-tier GPU in all probability have larger decision gameplay in thoughts, like 4K or 1440p. Still, it might be good if AMD fleshed these graphs out.
There’s additionally no analysis of ray tracing efficiency, which usually favors NVIDIA’s GPUs, or upscaling applied sciences (DLSS and FSR). That means customers aren’t getting an entire image of efficiency or efficiency per greenback.
That’s all to say, this device will not be an alternative to unbiased opinions with broader evaluation. However, AMD deserves kudos for the extent of transparency on show right here, because it may have aggressively cherry picked the information to solely or largely favor its personal GPUs. It did not go in that route.